- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Einstein–Bohr Debate: Finding a Common Ground of Understanding?
Foundations of Science 26 (1):97-101 (2021)
Abstract
After reminding the main issues at stake in the famous Einstein–Bohr debate initiated in 1935, we tentatively propose a way to get them closer, thus shedding a new light on this historical discussion.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Paul dirac and the Einstein-Bohr debate.Alisa Bokulich - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (1):103-114.
The Meaning of Quantum Theory: A Guide for Students of Chemistry and Physics.Jim Baggott - 1992 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Bohr and Einstein debate - Copenhagen Interpretation challenged.Rochelle Marianne Forrester - unknown
Bohr e Einstein: Filosofia, Debate e Controvérsia.Rodolfo Petrônio da Costa - 2018 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74 (1):279-294.
The Bohr-Einstein Photon Box Debate.Dennis Dieks - 1999 - In Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara (ed.), Language, Quantum, Music. Springer. pp. 283--292.
When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.
Einstein’s Local Realism vs. Bohr’s Instrumental Anti-Realism: The Debate Between Two Titans in the Quantum Theory Arena.Eduardo Simões - 2021 - Griot : Revista de Filosofia 21 (2):332-348.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-01-04
Downloads
25 (#736,849)
6 months
15 (#315,159)
2021-01-04
Downloads
25 (#736,849)
6 months
15 (#315,159)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 2004 - In John Stewart Bell (ed.), Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?Niels Bohr - 1935 - Physical Review 48 (696--702):696--702.
Do we really understand quantum mechanics?Franck Laloë - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Unity of Human Knowledge.Niels Bohr - 1963 - In Essays 1958-1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press. pp. 8--16.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-9b866bbb8-sl6b2 uwo