Metaphysical necessity is not logical necessity

Philosophical Studies 39 (2):141 - 153 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kripke and putnam have argued that metaphysical necessity is truth in all possible worlds, Hence is a kind of logica necessity; it is this claim I argue against. My argument proceeds by way of my considering and elaborating an example to show that although 'gold has atomic number 79' be counted a metaphysically necessary truth, There is a possible world in which it is false; it turns out to be for all I show here at most a physical necessity, True in all those worlds structurally similar to the actual world

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Powerlessness of Necessity.Markus Schrenk - 2010 - Noûs 44 (4):725-739.
The extent of metaphysical necessity.Daniel Nolan - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):313-339.
Are there necessary connections in nature?Milton Fisk - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):385-404.
Possible Ideas of Necessity in Indian Logic.Sundar Sarukkai - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (5):563-582.
Physical and metaphysical necessity.Stephen Leeds - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):458–485.
Supervenience and necessity: A response to Balaguer.J. M. Dieterle - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):302-309.
On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence.Fabrice Correia - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):639-653.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
175 (#107,103)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references