In Need of Meta-Scientific Experts?
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (2):50-52 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1080/21507740.2014.884185
My notes
Similar books and articles
Using Meta‐Scientific Studies to Clarify or Resolve Questions in the Philosophy and History of Science.David Faust & Paul E. Meehl - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S185-S196.
Turning Experts Into Self-Reflexive Speakers. The Problematization of Technical-Scientific Expertise Relative to Alternative Forms of Expertise.K. Mogendorff, H. F. M. Molder, C. M. J. Woerkum & H. G. J. Gremmen - unknown
When Expert Disagreement Supports the Consensus.Finnur Dellsén - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1):142-156.
The Roles of Institutional Trust and Distrust in Grounding Rational Deference to Scientific Expertise.Frédéric Bouchard - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):582-608.
Global and Local Pessimistic Meta-inductions.Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2013 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):409-428.
Four Meta-methods for the Study of Qualia.Lok-Chi Chan & Andrew J. Latham - 2019 - Erkenntnis 84 (1):145-167.
Axiological Scientific Realism and Methodological Prescription.Timothy D. Lyons - 2012 - In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 187--197.
Meta-Incommensurability between Theories of Meaning: Chemical Evidence.Nicholas W. Best - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (3):361-378.
Experts as non-experts: A case from SSC. [REVIEW]Hironori Ayabe - 1999 - AI and Society 13 (1-2):63-68.
Expert Trespassing Testimony and the Ethics of Science Communication.Mikkel Gerken - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):299-318.
Experts: What they are and how we recognize them—a discussion of Alvin goldman’s views.Oliver R. Scholz - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):187-205.
Experts in Dialogue: An Introduction. [REVIEW]Gábor Kutrovátz & Gábor Á Zemplén - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):275-283.
Meta-scientific Eliminativism: A Reconsideration of Chomsky's Review of Skinner's Verbal Behavior.John Collins - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):625-658.
How to Identify Moral Experts? An Application of Goldman’s Criteria for Expert Identification to the Domain of Morality.Martin Hoffmann - 2012 - Analyse & Kritik 34 (2):299-313.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-06-22
Downloads
6 (#1,106,014)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2018-06-22
Downloads
6 (#1,106,014)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Limited Relevance of Neuroimaging in Insanity Evaluations. [REVIEW]Michael J. Vitacco, Emily Gottfried, Scott O. Lilienfeld & Ashley Batastini - 2019 - Neuroethics 13 (3):249-260.
The Limited Relevance of Neuroimaging in Insanity Evaluations. [REVIEW]Michael J. Vitacco, Emily Gottfried, Scott O. Lilienfeld & Ashley Batastini - 2019 - Neuroethics 13 (3):249-260.
The Limited Relevance of Neuroimaging in Insanity Evaluations. [REVIEW]Michael J. Vitacco, Emily Gottfried, Scott O. Lilienfeld & Ashley Batastini - 2019 - Neuroethics 13 (3):249-260.
The Ethical Implications of Considering Neurolaw as a New Power.Daniel Pallarés-Dominguez & Elsa González Esteban - 2016 - Ethics and Behavior 26 (3):252-266.
References found in this work
On the Stand. Another Episode of Neuroscience and Law Discussion From Italy.Michele Farisco & Carlo Petrini - 2013 - Neuroethics 7 (2):243-245.
The Impact of Neuroscience and Genetics on the Law: A Recent Italian Case.M. Farisco & C. Petrini - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (3):317-319.
Neuroimaging, Expert Witnesses, and Ethics: Convergence and Conflict in the Courtroom.Leonard Berlin - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (2):3-8.
