Eine aktuelle ideologische Konfrontation: die diskursive liberale Demokratie vs. Kultursozialismus

In Markus Leimbach Stanislava Gálová (ed.), Internationalisierung von Bildung und Veränderung von gesellschaftlichen Prozessen: KAAD-Alumnivereine: Beiträge zur zivilgesellschaftlichen Entwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Bonn, Germany: KAAD e.V.. pp. 27-50 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to depict as accurately as possible the ideological conflict between liberal democracy and an insidious present-day version of communism, namely cultural socialism. Obviously, it is not easy to describe the essential relationships between two complex phenomena that evolve nonlinearly within a hypercomplex environment. The ideological systems of liberal democracy and cultural socialism involve both objective and subjective facts, material and immaterial components, neutral and emotion-laden aspects, deliberate and unintentional behaviors, linear and nonlinear effects, and planner-dependent and observer-dependent events. They affect each other and also fall under the influence of different non-political factors that characterize the Euro-Atlantic societies. In order to cope with the complexity of this research object we adopt the methodological dualism and a praxeological approach. The system of discursive liberal democracy can be seen – from a praxeological perspective – as a spontaneous order generated and maintained by three classes of attractors: the attractors of democracy (inclusion, political equality, high level of political participation, and majority rule), the attractors of liberalism (rule-governed political agency and the right to reasonable self-determination), and the attractors of public rationality (publicness, objectivity, verifiability, and revisability). Liberal democracy subsists in any society only if a sufficient number of its members reproduce the corresponding attractors in their political (and non-political) conduct. It is important to note that it is much easier to reproduce the attractors of democracy than the attractors of liberalism and rationality. Maybe because of that the socialists strive to undermine the system of liberal democracy by perverting – in the first instance – the standards of (public) rationality. One of the most important ingredient of cultural socialism is so-called "political correctness", by means of which people are prevented from expressing genuinely and politely certain beliefs or doubts in the public sphere even if they profess the standards of objectivity, verifiability, and revisability. Under the pressure of political correctness the attractors of public rationality tend to wither, the liberal dimension of the political system disappears too, and democracy becomes a sheer tyranny. Choosing a form of political organization is not a scientific, but a socio-political matter. It is not the job of social scientists to recommend or impose political goals in general and a specific political system in particular. However, inasmuch as some goals are set, social scientists can indicate the most appropriate means of meeting them. If the Euro-Atlantic societies still value liberal democracy and want to preserve it, it is important to teach them how to reproduce its attractors and to counteract the pernicious effects of cultural socialism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Integration of Populism into the Democratic Public Sphere.Gheorghe-Ilie Farte - 2017 - Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric 15 (2):87-109.
On the Presence of Educated Religious Beliefs in the Public Sphere.Gheorghe-Ilie Farte - 2015 - Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric 13 (2):146-178.
Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age.Stephen L. Newman - 1986 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1986 (70):187-193.
Rawls, Liberalism, and Democracy.John Skorupski - 2017 - Ethics 128 (1):173-198.
Liberal democracy and political Islam: The search for common ground.Mostapha Benhenda - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):88-115.
Liberty, Democracy, Community.Evan Simpson - 1992 - Public Affairs Quarterly 6 (3):327-344.
Liberty Challenge or Dangers of Liberal Democracy.Dalia Eidukienė - 2011 - Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 17 (1):69-75.
Understanding Liberal Democracy: Essays in Political Philosophy.Terence Cuneo (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-10

Downloads
229 (#65,884)

6 months
30 (#67,711)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gheorghe-Ilie Farte
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references