Intentions and potential intentions revisited

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 22 (3):203-230 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The importance of potential intentions has been demonstrated both in the construction of agent systems and in the formalisation of teamwork behaviour. However, there still lacks an adequate semantics for the notion of potential intentions as introduced by Grosz and Kraus in their SharedPlans framework. In this paper, we give a formal semantics to intentions and potential intentions, drawing upon both the representationalist approach and the accessibility-based approach. The model captures the dynamic relationship among intentions and potential intentions by providing semantic rules and conditions. Also, the model treats norms as a special class of intentional context, and it is shown that norms play a critical role in the dynamics of intentions in multiagent systems. The formal semantics allows us to validate some properties that are widely-accepted for intention attitudes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Proximal intentions, intention-reports, and vetoing.Alfred Mele - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):1 – 14.
Intentions, goals, and the archaeological record.Rex Welshon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):425-426.
Conditional Intentions.Luca Ferrero - 2009 - Noûs 43 (4):700 - 741.
We-intentions revisited.Raimo Tuomela - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (3):327 - 369.
Collective and joint intention.Raimo Tuomela - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):39-69.
The content of intentions.Elisabeth Patherie - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.
Humean Intentions.Michael Ridge - 1998 - American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2):157-178.
Intentions and programs.William Todd - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):530-541.
Reasons and Intentions.Bruno Verbeek (ed.) - 2007 - Ashgate.
Scepticism About Reflexive Intentions Refuted.Maciej Witek - 2009 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1):69-83.
What are intentions?Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard - 2010 - In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
27 (#572,408)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Kellogg Lewis - 1969 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references