History and Philosophy of Logic 41 (2):128-139 (2020)

Authors
Zhao Fan
University of Canterbury
Abstract
In this paper, I explore an intriguing view of definable numbers proposed by a Cambridge mathematician Ernest Hobson, and his solution to the paradoxes of definability. Reflecting on König’s paradox and Richard’s paradox, Hobson argues that an unacceptable consequence of the paradoxes of definability is that there are numbers that are inherently incapable of finite definition. Contrast to other interpreters, Hobson analyses the problem of the paradoxes of definability lies in a dichotomy between finitely definable numbers and not finitely definable numbers. To bypass this predicament, Hobson proposes a language dependent analysis of definable numbers, where the diagonal argument is employed as a means to generate more and more definable numbers. This paper examines Hobson’s work in its historical context, and articulates his argument in detail. It concludes with a remark on Hobson’s analysis of definability and Alan Turing’s analysis of computability.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/01445340.2020.1731784
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,526
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the N Tscheidungsproblem.Alan Turing - 1936 - Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42 (1):230-265.
Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types.Bertrand Russell - 1908 - American Journal of Mathematics 30 (3):222-262.
On Some Difficulties in the Theory of Transfinite Numbers and Order Types.Bertrand Russell - 1906 - Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 4 (14):29-53.
Remarks Before the Princeton Bicentennial Conference on Problems in Mathematics.Kurt Gödel - 1946 - In Solomon Feferman, John Dawson & Stephen Kleene (eds.), Kurt Gödel: Collected Works Vol. Ii. Oxford University Press. pp. 150--153.
Zermelo and Set Theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):487-553.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Version of P-Adic Minimality.Raf Cluckers & Eva Leenknegt - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (2):621-630.
Intersection Theory for o-Minimal Manifolds.Alessandro Berarducci & Margarita Otero - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 107 (1-3):87-119.
Undefinability Results in o-Minimal Expansions of the Real Numbers.Ricardo Bianconi - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 134 (1):43-51.
Δ0-Complexity of the Relation y = Πi ⩽ nF.Alessandro Berarducci & Paola D'Aquino - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1-2):49-56.
A Note on Groups Definable in the P -Adic Field.Anand Pillay & Ningyuan Yao - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (7-8):1029-1034.
Definability of Groups in ℵ₀-Stable Metric Structures.Itaï Ben Yaacov - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (3):817-840.
Taming the Indefinitely Extensible Definable Universe.L. Luna & W. Taylor - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (2):198-208.
A Remark on Divisibility of Definable Groups.Mário J. Edmundo - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (6):639-641.
A Weakly Definable Type Which is Not Definable.James H. Schmerl - 1993 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (6):463-468.
Definability of Groups in ℵ₀-Stable Metric Structures.Itaï Yaacov - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (3):817-840.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-20

Total views
14 ( #716,370 of 2,461,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,105 of 2,461,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes