Genetic Enhancement Revisited: Response to Open Peer Commentaries

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):6-8 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores a proper Confucian vision on genetic enhancement. It argues that while Confucians can accept a formal starting point that Michael Sandel proposes in his ethics of giftedness, namely, that children should be taken as gifts, Confucians cannot adopt his generalist strategy. The essay provides a Confucian full ethics of giftedness by addressing a series of relevant questions, such as what kind of gifts children are, where the gifts are from, in which way they are given, and for what purpose they are given. It indicates that Confucians should sort out different types of enhancement and bring them to the test of the Confucian values in terms of both Confucian virtue principles and specific ritual rules. It concludes that Confucians can accept some types of enhancement but must reject others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,869

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Peer Commentaries.Douglas Diekema & Norman Fost - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):4-6.
Response to open Peer commentaries on “why treat the wounded?”.Michael L. Gross - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):W1 – W3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
13 (#775,325)

6 months
1 (#483,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruiping Fan
City University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A confucian reflection on genetic enhancement.Ruiping Fan - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):62 – 70.
Confucianism's Challenge to Western Bioethics.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):73-74.
Concerns beyond the family.Joseph Chan - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):82 – 84.

Add more references