The real objective of Mendel's paper: A response to Monaghan and Corcos [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mendel's work in hybridization is ipso facto a study in inheritance. He is explicit in his interest to formulate universal generalizations, and at least in the case of the independent segregation of traits, he formulated his conclusions in the form of a law. Mendel did not discern, however, the inheritance of traits from that of the potential for traits. Choosing to study discrete non-overlapping traits, this did not hamper his efforts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#331,642)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

What is a Gene?Raphael Falk - 1986 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (2):133.
Mendel No Mendelian?Robert Cecil Olby - 1979 - History of Science 17 (1):53-72.
Has Mendel's work been rediscovered?R. Fisher - 1936 - Annals of Science 1 (2):115-137.
The real objective of Mendel's paper.Floyd V. Monaghan & Alain F. Corcos - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):267-292.
Pierre Louis Moreau De Maupertuis: A Precursor of Mendel?Iris Sandler - 1983 - Journal of the History of Biology 16 (1):100 - 136.

View all 8 references / Add more references