Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):333 - 344 (2008)
AbstractWhat motivates manufacturing companies to make costly investments in producing in an environmentally clean manner? The traditional argument is that such behaviour is value reducing, and that therefore, firms must be forced by regulation to invest in “green” production processes. A counter-argument is that firms have an incentive to make environmental investments in an attempt to attract “green” consumers and investors, hence gaining competitive advantage over their rivals. In this paper, we employ a game-theoretic approach that demonstrates that competing firms’ incentives to make voluntary investments in environmental “clean-up” are affected by the size of the investment costs and the extent of consumer and investor “green” awareness. We argue that an increase in green behaviour can be induced by a combination of governmental subsidies for firms that invest in environmentally clean production processes, together with an education program that promotes “green” awareness amongst consumers, investors and the managers themselves.
Similar books and articles
In Dirty Chains? Purchasing and Greener Manufacturing.Lutz Preuss - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):345 - 359.
The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms.Yu-Shan Chen - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3):271 - 286.
Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability. [REVIEW]Rosa Maria Dangelico & Devashish Pujari - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):471 - 486.
Social Costs of Environmental Justice Associated with the Practice of Green Marketing.Philemon Oyewole - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (3):239-251.
The Aesthetic Turn in Green Marketing: Environmental Consumer Ethics of Natural Personal Care Products.Anne Marie Todd - 2004 - Ethics and the Environment 9 (2):86-102.
The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications. [REVIEW]Kent Walker & Fang Wan - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):227-242.
Beyond “Does It Pay to Be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship.Heather R. Dixon-Fowler, Daniel J. Slater, Jonathan L. Johnson, Alan E. Ellstrand & Andrea M. Romi - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):353-366.
The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation. [REVIEW]Ching-Hsun Chang - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):361-370.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Corporate Social Responsibility: Review and Roadmap of Theoretical Perspectives.Jędrzej George Frynas & Camila Yamahaki - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (3):258-285.
The Value Relevance of Reputation for Sustainability Leadership.Isabel Costa Lourenço, Jeffrey Lawrence Callen, Manuel Castelo Branco & José Dias Curto - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 119 (1):17-28.
A New Framework Integrating Environmental Effects Into Technology Evaluation.Shiu-Wan Hung & Shih-Chang Tseng - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):543 - 556.
References found in this work
What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features?Pat Auger, Paul Burke, Timothy M. Devinney & Jordan J. Louviere - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):281 - 304.
Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR.David Williamson, Gary Lynch-Wood & John Ramsay - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):317-330.
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan.Yu-Shan Chen, Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4):331-339.
Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 42, Number 3 - SpringerLink.Pat Auger, Paul Burke, Timothy M. Devinney & Jordan J. Louviere - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):281-304.
Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage. [REVIEW]Morgan P. Miles & Jeffrey G. Covin - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3):299 - 311.