Enforced death: enforced life

Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (3):144-149 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of 'quality of life' frequently features in discussions about how it is appropriate to treat folk at the beginning and at the end of life. It is argued that there is a disjunction between its use in these two areas (1). In the case of disabled babies at the very beginning of life, 'quality of life' considerations are frequently used to justify enforced death on the basis that the babies in question would be better off dead. At times, babies with severe disabilities are thus allowed to die or even killed. In the case of terminally ill people 'quality of life' is also important in guiding the actions of doctors. However, in the case of individuals who do not wish to live any longer because their quality of life is so poor that they would rather be dead, quality of life is likely to be dropped as a guiding principle. Thus patients who wish to die and ask to be killed, will most often be forced to endure enforced life

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,509

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
24 (#477,320)

6 months
1 (#417,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gavin Fairbairn
Leeds Beckett University

Citations of this work

Predictive Testing for Huntington Disease-Response.J. Adams - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):48-48.
Response to Huggins and Hayden.J. Adams - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):48-48.
Enforced Death: Enforced Life.C. Saunders - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):48-48.
Enforced Death: Enforced Life--Another Response.S. Singh - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):48-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references