Abstract
In his recent work, "The Collapse of the Fact-Value Dichotomy," Hilary Putnam traces the history of the fact-value dichotomy from Hume to Stevenson and Logical Positivism. The aim of this historical reconstruction is to undermine the foundations of the dichotomy, showing that it is of a piece with the dichotomy - untenable, as we know now - of "analytic" and "synthetic" judgments. Putnam's own thesis is that facts and values are "entangled" in a way that precludes any attempt to draw a sharp distinction between "value judgments" and "matters of fact." The idea of an "entanglement of facts and values" Putnam rightly attributes to John Dewey, who - we should add - made of it the main issue in his controversy with Logical Positivism. Nevertheless, a closer inspection of the problem whose history Putnam summarizes could bring into light important aspects of it that have been neglected. It is worth reading in this connection the intercourse between Dewey and Stevenson. Secondly, it is striking that Putnam's version of the history of the fact-value dichotomy hardly mentions the problem that caused this very dichotomy to arise in the first place: i. e., the problem of insoluble moral disagreements. By contrast, Dewey's attack on the dualism of fact and value can be read as an attempt to redescribe this kind of disagreements in a way that makes room for intelligent inquiry, and consequently for rational expectations of agreement. The "entanglement thesis" surely is a part of this re-description. But then it must have implications - particularly for the analysis of value-justification - which are overlooked, or by-passed, by Putnam. This leaves the question open whether Putnam and Dewey subscribe to different versions of pragmatism with regard to norms and values
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics and Language.Charles L. Stevenson - 1945 - American Mathematical Society.
Theory of Valuation.J. Dewey - 1939 - In J. A. Boydston (ed.), Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 250.
Ethics and Language.Charles L. Stevenson - 1945 - Mind 54 (216):362-373.
Ethics and Language.Charles L. Stevenson - 1946 - Philosophy of Science 13 (1):80-80.
Ethics and Language.Charles Leslie Stevenson - 1944 - Yale University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Moral Evil Demons.Ralph Wedgwood - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise.Sarah McGrath - 2008 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 87-108.
An Alternative to Relativism.John K. Davis - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (2):17-37.
Gibbardian Humility: Moral Fallibility and Moral Smugness.James Lenman - 2014 - Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (2):235-245.
Crispin Wright on Moral Disagreement.Folke Tersman - 1998 - Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):359-365.
Entanglement From the Vacuum.Benni Reznik - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (1):167-176.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-07

Total views
56 ( #194,953 of 2,462,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #26,886 of 2,462,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes