The incorrigibility of first person disavowals

Personalist 56 (4):389-394 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic disavowals and self-deception.Robert N. Audi - 1976 - Personalist 57 (4):378-385.
A problem with incorrigibility.James E. Tomberlin - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (4):507-12.
Defining incorrigibility.George S. Pappas - 1975 - Personalist 56 (4):395-402.
Avowals are more corrigible than you think.Brian Ellis - 1976 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (2):116-122.
The expression theory of avowals.James E. Tomberlin - 1968 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (September):91-96.
Incorrigibility.Francis W. Dauer - 1981 - Ratio (Misc.) 23 (December):98-113.
The limits of self-knowledge.Robert Audi - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (December):253-267.
Incorrigibility, knowledge and justification.George S. Pappas - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (April):219-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Hamilton
Kansas State University

Citations of this work

Perspectives on Self-Deception.Brian P. McLaughlin & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.) - 1988 - University of California Press.
Bibliography.Uma Narayan - 1988 - In Brian P. McLaughlin & Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Perspectives on Self-Deception. University of California Press. pp. 553-558.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references