Two ‘Proofs’ of God's Existence: A. C. EWING

Religious Studies 1 (1):29-45 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I do not think that the existence of God can be proved or even that the main justification for the belief can be found in argument in the ordinary sense of that term, but I think two of the three which have, since Kant at least, been classified as the traditional arguments of natural theology have some force and are worthy of serious consideration. This consideration I shall now proceed to give. I cannot say this of the remaining one of the arguments, the ‘ontological proof’, which I shall therefore not discuss here.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,656

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza’s Arguments for the Existence of God.Martin Lin - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):269-297.
Awareness of God.A. C. Ewing - 1965 - Philosophy 40 (151):1 - 17.
The rationality of belief in God.George I. Mavrodes - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Fool-proof proofs of God.Frank B. Dilley - 1977 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (1):18 - 35.
R. Joseph Albo's Discussion of the Proofs for the Existence of God.Dror Ehrlich - 2007 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 15 (2):1-37.
The God Dialogues: A Philosophical Journey.Torin Andrew Alter - 2011 - Oxford University Press. Edited by Robert J. Howell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
83 (#185,592)

6 months
5 (#247,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references