Other voices, other minds

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):213-222 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Solipsism can be refuted along fairly traditional, internalist lines, by means of a second-order induction. We are justified in believing in other minds, because other people tell us that they have minds, and we have good inductive reason to believe that whatever certain others say is likely to be true. This simple argument is sound, the author argues, even though we are in no prior position to believe that other thinking people exist as such, or that the sounds they make have any meaning. The mere phenomenal surfaces of others' statements form sufficient grounds for the induction that the argument requires

Similar books and articles

Solipsism and the Solitary Language User.Irwin Goldstein - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (1):35-47.
The range principle and the problem of other minds.Paul Sagal & Gunnar Borg - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):477-91.
Mr Hampshire on the analogy of feeling.Erik Gotlind - 1954 - Mind 63 (October):519-524.
Methodological solipsism.Harold W. Noonan - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 40 (September):269-274.
The apriority of the starting‐point of Kant's transcendental epistemology.Vasilis Politis - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):255 – 284.
Davidson's Epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 2003 - In Kirk Ludwig (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Donald Davidson. Cambridge University Press.
Solipsism and the problem of other minds.Stephen Thornton - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
279 (#69,679)

6 months
50 (#81,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Everett
State University of New York at Geneseo

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references