Kierkegaard on Religious Authority

Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):48-67 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the important role authority plays in the religious thought of Søren Kierkegaard. In contrast to dominant modes of thought in both modern and postmodern philosophy, Kierkegaard considers the religious authority inherent in a special revelation from God to be the fundamental source of religious truth. The question as to how a genuine religious authority can be recognized is particularly difficult for Kierkegaard, since rational evaluation of authorities could be seen as a rejection of that authority in favor of the authority of reason. However, I argue that Kierkegaard does offer criteria for recognizing a genuine religious authority. I explore these criteria and try to show they are helpful, but I argue that there is no principled reason he should not accept other criteria he rejects, such as the criterion of miracles. In conclusion, I suggest that both the criteria offered by Kierkegaard and the method by which they are derived require us to question certain Enlightenment views as to what should count as “rational.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is the Single Individual?Brayton Polka - 2005 - Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):157-175.
Authority, Autonomy, Authenticity.Peter J. Mehl - 1997 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1-2):10-15.
Understanding a Suggestion of Professor Cavell's.Ronald E. Hustwit - 1978 - Philosophy Research Archives 4:329-347.
Kierkegaard's Defense of Reason.Regina Maureen Turner - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Kansas
Kierkegaard and Evans on the problem of Abraham.R. Zachary Manis - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):474-492.
Kierkegaard as Religious Thinker.David Jay Gouwens - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Paradox of Inwardness in Kant and Kierkegaard.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2016 - Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (4):738-751.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
40 (#347,838)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

C. Stephen Evans
Baylor University

Citations of this work

II—John Lippitt: What Neither abraham nor Johannes de Silentio Could Say.John Lippitt - 2008 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):79-99.
II—John Lippitt: What Neither abraham nor Johannes de Silentio Could Say.John Lippitt - 2008 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):79-99.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references