Boethius on Modality and Future Contingents

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):247-271 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In The Consolation of Philosophy Boethius addresses two main problems posed by the problem of future contingents that shed important light on his conception of necessity and possibility: (1) a logical problem that alleges that if propositions about the future are true now then they are necessarily true, and (2) a theological problem that centers on a supposed incompatibility between divine foreknowledge and a contingent future. In contrast to established readings of the Consolation, I argue that a proper understanding of Book V requires understanding the modal concepts employed there in atemporal terms. This interpretation requires revising our traditional understanding of the two problems present in the Consolation text, particularly in seeing how timeless knowledge or truth could be conceived as a threat to human freedom. It also stresses the importance of a strategy used by Boethius to disambiguate the scope of modal operators used in his opponent’s arguments and how that strategy unifies his discussion in Book V.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,001

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowing Future Contingents.Ezio Di Nucci - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
Sea Battle Semantics.Berit Brogaard - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):326–335.
Forgetfulness and Misology in Boethius's Consolation of Philosophy.Antonio Donato - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (3):463 - 485.
A future for the thin red line.Alex Malpass & Jacek Wawer - 2012 - Synthese 188 (1):117-142.
Boethius.John Marenbon - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Future Contingents and the Battle Tomorrow.Michael Perloff & Nuel Belnap - 2011 - Review of Metaphysics 64 (3):581-602.
A Tense Logic for Boethius.John N. Martin - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (2):203-212.
In Defence of Ockhamism.Sven Rosenkranz - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (3):617-631.


Added to PP

66 (#192,001)

6 months
6 (#144,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Evans
University of Indianapolis

Citations of this work

Boethius and the Causal Direction Strategy.Jonathan Evans - 2018 - Ancient Philosophy 38 (1):167-185.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references