Universals: A New Look at an Old Problem [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 20 (2):383-383 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After setting up the classic Platonic doctrine of universals, Zabeeh reviews the Aristotelian and British empiricist attacks on this doctrine, and the doctrine of general ideas. Zabeeh's own "new" look consists in a reworking of many currently familiar ideas to come up with the position that universals are the meanings of general terms and the meanings of general terms are the way in which they are used. While this may do as the start of a semantical theory of universals, it hardly touches the problem of their ontological status. The same basic semantical theory is compatible with realism, conceptualism, or nominalism, as Carnap has shown. Page 33 belongs in place of page 34, page 34 in place of page 32.—E. A. R.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Universals, Realism, and God.Paul Gould - 2012 - Metaphysica 13 (2):183-194.
The philosophy of linguistic analysis and the problem of universals.H. J. McCloskey - 1964 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3):329-338.
Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and Its Problems.Riin Sirkel - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
Laws, the Inference Problem, and Uninstantiated Universals.Bradley Rives - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):496-520.
Platonism and the invention of the problem of universals.Lloyd P. Gerson - 2004 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3):233-256.
The problem of universals.Charles Landesman - 1971 - New York,: Basic Books.
Two approaches to the problem of universals by J. M. Bocheński.Mariusz Grygianiec - 2013 - Studies in East European Thought 65 (1-2):27-42.
The problem of universals in Indian philosophy.Raja Ram Dravid - 1972 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. Edited by Kanshi Ram.
What's Wrong with Ostrich Nominalism?Howard Peacock - 2009 - Philosophical Papers 38 (2):183-217.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references