Haecceitas as Value and as Moral Horizon

American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):459-480 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper seeks to provide a phenomenological articulation of the Scotist notion of haecceitas, interpreting Scotus’s principle of individuation at once as an ontological as well as a moral principle. Growing out of certain suggestions made by James Hart in his Who One Is, this interpretation is meant to provide the phenomenological ethics of both Edmund Husserl and Max Scheler with a useful theoretical tool in the Scotist notion of haecceitas interpreted as a horizon of value in order more fully to develop the phenomenological idea of the ethical life as a task that specifically seeks to realize as its highest goal the vocation of the person to his or her ideal, true self. The main implication of Scotus’s thought, here, for phenomenology will be the ability to further delimit haecceitas as an objective moral principle that refutes the frequent charge of relativistic subjectivism in the phenomenological theory of ethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scotus and Haecceitas, Aquinas and Esse.James B. Reichmann - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):63-75.
Spielraum, phenomenology, and the art of virtue: hints of an ‘embodied’ ethics in Kant.Donald A. Landes - 2016 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24 (2):234-251.
William James and phenomenology.James M. Edie - 1970 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (3):481-526.
Wertapriori und Wertsein in der materialen Wertethik Max Schelers.Wei Zhang - 2010 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 2 (1):178-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-04

Downloads
49 (#318,154)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?