Crucial Experiments: Priestley and Lavoisier

Journal of the History of Ideas 18 (2):205 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2707624

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Spekulation und Physik im 18. Jahrhundert. Lomonossow, Kant und Lavoisier in Sachen Erhaltungsgesetz und Äther.Stamatios D. Gerogiorgakis - 2005 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 28 (3):255-264.
Electricity, Knowledge, and the Nature of Progress in Priestley's Thought.John G. McEvoy - 1979 - British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1):1-30.
GUERLAC, H. - Lavoisier. The crucial Year. The background and origin of his first experiments on combustion in 1772. [REVIEW]G. Montalenti - 1965 - Scientia 59:32.
Lavoisier -- The Crucial Year: The Background and Origin of His First Experiments on Combustion in 1772. Henry Guerlac.Henry M. Leicester - 1963 - Isis 54 (1):158-159.
Lavoisier's Early Career in Science: An Examination of Some New Evidence.J. B. Gough - 1968 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (1):52-57.
Guerlac, H. - Lavoisier. The Crucial Year. The Background And Origin Of His First Experiments On Combustion In 1772. [REVIEW]G. Montalenti - 1965 - Scientia 59 (100):32.
Scientific Explanation in the History of Chemistry: The Priestley-Lavoisier Debate.Prajit Kumar Basu - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa
Priestley and Lavoisier.John G. Mcevoy - 2007 - Annals of Science 64 (4):595-605.
The newer views of Priestley and Lavoisier.L. L. D. E. - 1941 - Annals of Science 5 (1):1-56.
The newer views of Priestley and Lavoisier.Philip Hartog - 1941 - Annals of Science 5 (1):1-56.
Lavoisier -- The Crucial Year: The Background and Origin of His First Experiments on Combustion in 1772 by Henry Guerlac. [REVIEW]Henry Leicester - 1963 - Isis 54:158-159.
Lavoisier, Priestley and the Philosophes: Epistemic and Linguistic Dimensions to the Chemical Revolution.John Mcevoy - 1989 - Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 8:91-98.
Similarities and dissimilarities between Joseph Priestley's and Antoine Lavoisier's chemical beliefs.Prajit K. Basu - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (3):445-469.
The conceptual structure of the chemical revolution.Paul Thagard - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):183-209.
Political writings.Joseph Priestley - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter N. Miller.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
32 (#488,786)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Scientific pluralism and the Chemical Revolution.Martin Kusch - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:69-79.
How to Split a Theory: Defending Selective Realism and Convergence without Proximity.David Harker - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):79-106.
On the neglect of the philosophy of chemistry.J. van Brakel - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (2):111-174.
The ‘absolute existence’ of phlogiston: the losing party's point of view.Victor D. Boantza & Ofer Gal - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Science 44 (3):317-342.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references