On ‘aristocratic’ dignity

European Journal of Political Theory 19 (3):399-407 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his recent book, Andrea Sangiovanni raises various objections against what he calls the “aristocratic” conception of dignity – the idea that dignity represents a kind of high- ranking social status. In this short article, I suggest that Sangiovanni gives the aristocrats less credit than they deserve. Not only do his objections target an uncharitably narrow version of the view, Sangiovanni surreptitiously incorporates aspects of the aristocratic conception of dignity into his own (supposedly non-dignitarian) theory of moral equality.

Similar books and articles

Undignified bioethics.Alasdair Cochrane - 2009 - Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.
Nature of dignity and human dignity.Vasil Gluchman - 2017 - Human Affairs 27 (2):131-144.
Aranold, Nietzsche and the aristocratic vision.Alan Kahan - 2012 - History of Political Thought 33 (1):125-143.
Selbstachtung und Menschenwürde.Ralf Stoecker - 2004 - Studia Philosophica 63:107-120.
Practical Dignity in Caring.L. H. Toiviainen & D. Seedhouse - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (3):246-255.
Practical Dignity in Caring.Leila Shotton & David Seedhouse - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (3):246-255.
Criminalizing Behaviour to Protect Human Dignity.Tatjana Hörnle - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):307-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-29

Downloads
205 (#93,227)

6 months
73 (#57,475)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Etinson
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dignity: Its History and Meaning.Michael Rosen - 2012 - Harvard University Press.

Add more references