The classicality of classical Mathematics

Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (2):365-377 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

PurposeGraham Priest has recently argued that the distinctive trait of classical mathematics is that the conditional of its underlying logic—that is, classical logic—is extensional. In this article, I aim to present an alternate explanation of the specificity of classical mathematics.MethodI examine Priest's argument for his claim and show its shortcomings. Then I deploy a model-theoretic presentation of logics that allows comparing them, and the mathematics based on them, more fine-grainedly.ResultsSuch a model-theoretic presentation of logics suggests that the specific character of classical logic consists in the structure that it confers to its truth values and in the structure of the evaluation indices of its formulas, and that this trait is useful to explain the specific character of the logics and the mathematics based on them.ConclusionThe extensionality of the conditional in classical logic is a by-product of other structural features of a logic, which are more likely to be what gives a kind of mathematics based on it its specific character.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Transparent Intensional Logic a non-classical logic?Pavel Materna - 2014 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 23 (1):47-55.
Decoherence and the Copenhagen cut.Scott Tanona - 2013 - Synthese 190 (16):3625-3649.
Classicality Lost: K3 and LP after the Fall.Matthias Jenny - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):43-53.
What Is the Specificity of Classical Mathematics?Graham Priest - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):115-121.
Contra-classical logics.Lloyd Humberstone - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):438 – 474.
Intentional mathematics.Stewart Shapiro (ed.) - 1985 - New YorK, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Questioning Constructive Reverse Mathematics.I. Loeb - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):131-140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-28

Downloads
14 (#934,671)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luis Estrada-González
National Autonomous University of Mexico

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Logical Pluralism, Meaning-Variance, and Verbal Disputes.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):355-373.
Sorites paradoxes and the semantics of vagueness.Michael Tye - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:189-206.
Quine and Slater on paraconsistency and deviance.Francesco Paoli - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):531-548.
Relevant arithmetic.Robert Meyer - 1976 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 5 (4):133-135.
What Is the Specificity of Classical Mathematics?Graham Priest - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):115-121.

Add more references