“Scaffolding” and “affordance” as integrative concepts in the cognitive sciences

Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):1-14 (2014)

Abstract

There are (at least) two ways to think of the differences in basic concepts and typologies that one can find in the different scientific practices that constitute a research tradition. One is the fundamentalist view: the fewer the better. The other is a non-fundamentalist view of science whereby the integration of different concepts into the right abstraction grounds an explanation that is not grounded as the sum of the explanations supported by the parts. Integrative concepts are often associated with idealizations that can successfully set the stage for different phenomena to be compared or for explanations of different phenomena to be considered as jointly increasing our understanding of reality beyond that which each explanation provides separately. In this paper, our aim is to argue for the importance of the notions of an ?affordance? and ?scaffolding? as integrative concepts in the cognitive sciences. The integrational role of the concept of affordance is closely related with the capacity of affordances to generate the scaffoldings leading to the integration. The capacities of affordances that turn them into (stable) scaffoldings explain why such notions are often used interchangeably (as we shall see). On this basis, we aim to show that the concepts of affordance and scaffolding provide the sort of epistemic perspective that can overcome common complaints about the limits and unity of the cognitive sciences once claims about extended cognition are taken seriously

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-18

Downloads
54 (#213,987)

6 months
3 (#198,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sergio F. Martinez
National Autonomous University of Mexico

Similar books and articles

Extending the Notion of Affordance.Silvano Zipoli Caiani - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2):275-293.
The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge.Maria Serban - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (6):934-938.
The Common Structure is the Affordance in the Ecology.Paul J. Treffner - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):731-732.
Is Mind Extended or Scaffolded? Ruminations on Sterelney’s Extended Stomach.Jennifer Greenwood - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (3):629-650.
Morality and a Scaffolding of Facts.Drew Carter - 2014 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (1):78-90.
Cognitive Anthropologists: Who Needs Them?Annelie Rothe - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):387-395.
Reliability in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Meta-Meta Analysis.Colin Klein - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (4):606-609.
Beyond Substance Concepts in Cognitive Development.Katherine Nelson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):81-82.
Why Concepts Can't Be Theories.Jack M. C. Kwong - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):309-325.