Résistance au réductionnisme

Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 56 (56):99-116 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article highlights the points in common between Kant’s theory of biology and Canguilhem’s philosophy of medicine. It shows how these two conceptions contribute in complementary ways to a better understanding of freedom of action within the limits of biological naturality. Using Kant and Canguilhem as a starting point, an argument is put forward against biological reductionism—and for resistance against biopolitical instrumentalization of the life sciences for ideological-totalitarian purposes of homogenization and normalization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Giuseppe Bianco, Charles T. Wolfe & Gertrudis Van de Vijver - 2023 - In Giuseppe Bianco, Charles T. Wolfe & Gertrudis Van de Vijver (eds.), Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology. Springer. pp. 1-9.
La biophilosophie de Georges Canguilhem.Charles T. Wolfe - 2017 - Scienza and Filosofia 17:33–54.
Organism, normativity, plasticity: Canguilhem, Kant, Malabou.Sebastian Rand - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4):341-357.
Knowledge, Life, and Error. Nietzschean Themes in the Work of Georges Canguilhem.Henning Schmidgen - 2023 - In Giuseppe Bianco, Charles T. Wolfe & Gertrudis Van de Vijver (eds.), Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology. Springer. pp. 147-157.
Georges Canguilhem on sex determination and the normativity of life.Ivan Moya-Diez & Matteo Vagelli - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (4):1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-05

Downloads
3 (#1,847,806)

6 months
3 (#1,467,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?