Philosophical Explorations 24 (2):281-287 (2021)

Authors
Seyyed Mohsen Eslami
Tarbiat Modares University
Abstract
The possibility of acting for normative reasons calls for explanation, considering that such reasons are facts. Facing this issue, some argue that to act for a normative reason, the normative reason and the reason we act for (i.e. the motivating reason) need to be identical. Others reject the idea that normative reasons are facts in the first place. A conciliatory proposal is that by appealing to dispositions we can simultaneously accept that normative reasons are facts and that we can act for them, without accepting the identity of the normative reasons and the motivating reason. After sketching an example of such a view, I mention an obstacle on its way. This view relies heavily on the correspondence relation, to make the action connected to the normative reason via a descriptive belief. It is argued that this is challenging since the correspondence relation might not be suitable to play the metaphysical role needed.
Keywords Normative reasons  acting for reasons  correspondence relation  motivating reasons  theory of action  dispositions
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/13869795.2021.1908579
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Donald Davidson - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.
Practical Reality.Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Philosophy 78 (305):414-425.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Correspondence and Dispositional Relations.Susanne Mantel - 2021 - Philosophical Explorations 24 (2):288-293.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Normative Requirements.John Broome - 1999 - Ratio 12 (4):398–419.
Weighing Reasons.Garrett Cullity - 2019 - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
How Reasons Are Sensitive to Available Evidence.Benjamin Kiesewetter - 2018 - In Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting (eds.), Normativity: Epistemic and Practical. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 90-114.
Acting and Believing Under the Guise of Normative Reasons.Keshav Singh - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (2):409-430.
Norm and Law in the Theory of Action.Ruth Macklin - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):400 – 409.
Desires, Reasons, and Causes. [REVIEW]Stephen Darwall - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):436–443.
Desires, Reasons, and Causes.Stephen Darwall - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):436-443.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-06

Total views
42 ( #267,268 of 2,497,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #55,676 of 2,497,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes