Does Depression Invalidate Competence? Consultants' Ethical, Psychiatric, and Legal Considerations

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (4):505 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethical principle of respect for autonomy has come into its own In American medicine since World War II as equal in importance to the traditional medicomoral principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence. Respect for autonomy provides the ethical underpinning for the patient's right to exercise an informed choice – whether to consent to or to refuse recommended medical treatment. However, an informed choice demands a certain level of competence. Typical criteria for patient competence to accept or to refuse medical treatments Include ability to make a choice and ability to comprehend the nature of the treatment, as well as the risks and benefits of accepting or refusing the treatment

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Depression and competence to refuse psychiatric treatment.A. Rudnick - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):151-155.
Ethical values of executive search consultants.Ghee-Soon Lim & Claudia Chan - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (3):213 - 226.
The virtuous psychiatrist: character ethics in psychiatric practice.Jennifer Radden - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Z. Sadler.
Varieties of Temporal Experience in Depression.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (2):114-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?