Making someone child-sized forever? Ethical considerations in inhibiting the growth of a developmentally disabled child

Clinical Ethics 2 (1):46-49 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent case, parents of a profoundly developmentally disabled child asked physicians to use high-dose oestrogen to inhibit the growth of their child in the interests of allowing better care of her as she ages. The physicians asked whether such an intervention would be ethically acceptable. Such an intervention would seem to violate the rights of the child to bodily integrity and to normal growth, making the intervention ethically objectionable. But in this paper, I argue that in some rare instances, a developmentally disabled child may have only a minimal right against interference with her growth. In those instances, parents may be acting ethically if they use medical interventions to inhibit the growth of their child for the purposes of facilitating better care. But they may so intervene only when the child's disabilities are so profound that the child has no personal interest in developing an adult size and when the intervention is the least intrusive means available for facilitating the care of the child

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adoption Is Better than Abortion.Kevin McGovern - 2010 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (1):4.
Child Labor Abroad: Five Policy Options.Roland Pierik - 2004 - Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly 24 (3):9-13.
The uncomfortable truth about wrongful life cases.Hyunseop Kim - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):623-641.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
42 (#332,036)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ashley Revisited: A Response to the Critics.Douglas S. Diekema & Norman Fost - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):30-44.
Agency, duties and the "Ashley treatment".N. Tan & I. Brassington - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):658-661.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references