In defense of the Ethics Code: a comment on O’Donohue (2019)

Ethics and Behavior 30 (4):299-302 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a commentary on O’Donohue’s2019 37-point critique of the American Psychological Association Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct ([Ethics Code] 2017). In this brief paper, we respond to the article by addressing our most important disagreements with O’Donohue’s arguments as well as areas of agreement. While we disagree with many of O’Donohue’s points, we also view his critique as being important and timely given that the 2018 APA Ethics Task Force is currently exploring potential revisions to the Code.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Torture in the Naked Public Square.William D. Eisenhower - 2017 - Ethics and Behavior 27 (5):423-435.
A critical examination of the ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.William O'Donohue & Richard Mangold - 1996 - In William T. O'Donohue & Richard F. Kitchener (eds.), The Philosophy of Psychology. Sage Publications. pp. 371--80.
Should a public relations code of ethics be enforced?Yi-Hui Huang - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (3):259 - 270.
Is the 2008 NMC Code ethical?Stephen Pattison & Paul Wainwright - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (1):9-18.
What can we learn by looking for the first code of professional ethics?Michael Davis - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (5):433-454.
Insanity Defenses.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Ken Levy - 2011 - In John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 299--334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-25

Downloads
13 (#1,006,512)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?