- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Contributions of the Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science in Science Education
Science & Education 28 (3-5):311-328 (2019)
Abstract
The emergence of the Family Resemblance Approach to nature of science has prompted a fresh wave of scholarship embracing this new approach in science education. The FRA provides an ambitious and practical vision for what NOS-enriched science content should aim for and promotes evidence-based practices in science education to support the enactment of such vision. The present article provides an overview of research and development efforts utilizing the FRA and reviews recent empirical studies including those conducted in preservice science teacher education as well as studies utilizing FRA to analyze NOS representations in curriculum documents and textbooks. The article concludes with implications and recommendations for future research and practice.My notes
Similar books and articles
A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education.Gürol Irzık, Gurol Irzik & Robert Nola - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (7-8):591-607.
New Directions for Nature of Science Research.Gürol Irzik & Robert Nola - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 999-1021.
Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education.Zoubeida R. Dagher & Sibel Erduran - 2016 - Science & Education 25 (1-2):147-164.
From FRA to RFN, or How the Family Resemblance Approach Can Be Transformed for Science Curriculum Analysis on Nature of Science.Ebru Kaya & Sibel Erduran - 2016 - Science & Education 25 (9-10):1115-1133.
Looking at the Social Aspects of Nature of Science in Science Education Through a New Lens.Sila Kaya, Sibel Erduran, Naomi Birdthistle & Orla McCormack - 2018 - Science & Education 27 (5-6):457-478.
Science & Education in Educational Perspectives: Recognizing the Contributions of Michael R. Matthews.Zoubeida R. Dagher & Peter Heering - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (7-8):821-826.
Developing a graduate level science education course on the nature of science.David C. Eichinger, Sandra K. Abell & Zoubeida R. Dagher - 1997 - Science & Education 6 (4):417-429.
Meta-Theoretical Contributions to the Constitution of a Model-Based Didactics of Science.Yefrin Ariza, Pablo Lorenzano & Agustín Adúriz-Bravo - 2016 - Science & Education 25 (7-8):747-773.
Interactions of Economics of Science and Science Education: Investigating the Implications for Science Teaching and Learning.Sibel Erduran & Ebru Z. Mugaloglu - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (10):2405-2425.
Laws and Explanations in Biology and Chemistry: Philosophical Perspectives and Educational Implications.Zoubeida R. Dagher & Sibel Erduran - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1203-1233.
António F. Cachapuz is a professor of science education at the University of Aveiro, Portugal. He has published on the role of language in science learning. More recently his main research interest is the application of the history and philosophy of science to science education. Marta Cardenas is a professor of physics at the National University of Tucumán. [REVIEW]Zoubeida R. Dagher - 2002 - Science & Education 11:619-622.
Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry.Reneé S. Schwartz, Norman G. Lederman & Barbara A. Crawford - 2004 - Science Education 88 (4):610-645.
Tailoring science education graduate programs to the needs of all students.Zoubeida R. Dagher & Saouma B. Boujaoude - 1996 - Science Education 80 (1):89-91.
Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies in science education. [REVIEW]Zoubeida R. Dagher - 1995 - Science Education 79 (3):295-312.
Transforming science curricula in higher education: Feminist contributions.Bonnie Spanier - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):467-480.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-26
Downloads
30 (#519,519)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
2019-05-26
Downloads
30 (#519,519)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Systematicity: The Nature of Science.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2013 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education.Gürol Irzık, Gurol Irzik & Robert Nola - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (7-8):591-607.
New Directions for Nature of Science Research.Gürol Irzik & Robert Nola - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 999-1021.
Looking at the Social Aspects of Nature of Science in Science Education Through a New Lens.Sila Kaya, Sibel Erduran, Naomi Birdthistle & Orla McCormack - 2018 - Science & Education 27 (5-6):457-478.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo