Once You Start Using Slippery Slope Arguments, You 're on a Very Slippery Slope'

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (4):629-647 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) are, so I argue, arguments from consequences which have the following peculiar characteristic: They take advantage of our being less than perfect in making—and acting according to—distinctions. But then, once SSAs are seen for what they are, they can be turned against themselves. Being less than perfect at making the second‐order distinction between distinctions we're good at abiding by and those we're bad at abiding by, we're bound to fail to make the distinction between good and bad SSAs. One can therefore construct an SSA, the conclusion of which is, that we ought not to use SSAs. After characterizing SSAs and constructing the SSA against the use of SSAs, I then explore its implications

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consequentialism and the slippery slope: A response to Clark.Jonathan Hughes - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):213–220.
Arguing along the slippery slope of human embryo research.Jeanne Salmon Freeman - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):61-81.
Debunking the slippery slope argument against human germ-line Gene therapy.David Resnik - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40.
Slippery slope arguments.David E. White - 1985 - Metaphilosophy 16 (2‐3):206-213.
Consequentialism, complacency, and slippery slope arguments.Justin Oakley & Dean Cocking - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):227-239.
Slippery slope arguments.Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
212 (#87,002)

6 months
7 (#175,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Agency, Shmagency.David Enoch - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (2):169-198.
Slippery Slope Arguments.Anneli Jefferson - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (10):672-680.
The Empirical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Non-Voluntary Euthanasia.Penney Lewis - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):197-210.
The Empirical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Non-Voluntary Euthanasia.Penney Lewis - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):197-210.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references