Against Utopianism: Noncompliance and Multiple Agents

Philosophers' Imprint 18 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does it count against a normative theory in political philosophy that it is in some important sense infeasible, that its prescriptions are unlikely to be complied with? Though a positive answer seems plausible, it has proved hard to defend against the claim that this is not how normative theories work - noncompliance shows a problem with the noncomplying agents, not with the normative theory. I think that this line of thought - this defense of Utopianism - wins the battle but loses the war. It’s right about what does and what does not refute a normative theory. It’s wrong in misidentifying the problem. The right way to think about the feasibility worry is as essentially involving multiple agents, and how expected noncompliance by one agent may refute a normative claim addressed at another. Thus understood, feasibility problems may very well refute a theory in political philosophy. In this paper I develop this understanding of the feasibility worry, tie it to more general discussions in normative ethics, and in political philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The feasibility issue.Nicholas Southwood - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (8):e12509.
Political irrationality, utopianism, and democratic theory.Aaron Ancell - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (1):3-21.
Beyond “ought Implies Feasible”.Jürgen Sirsch - 2021 - Metaphilosophy 52 (2):280-301.
Against Ideal Guidance.David Wiens - 2015 - Journal of Politics 77 (2):433-446.
Global Democracy and Feasibility.Eva Erman - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (3):1-21.
Realism and relativism about the normative.Paul Boghossian - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Being realistic and demanding the impossible.Enzo Rossi - 2019 - Constellations 26 (4):638-652.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-14

Downloads
457 (#63,569)

6 months
119 (#46,020)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

Carbon Offsetting.Dan Baras - 2023 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 27 (3):281-298.
Politics and suffering.David Enoch - forthcoming - Analytic Philosophy.
A Defence of Robust Idealism in Political Philosophy.Stefano Bertea - 2023 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 10 (2):249-266.
What Do We Want? To Eliminate Gender! When Do We Want It? Later!Daniel Weltman - 2024 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 105 (4):510-40.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references