The Commonsense Case for Ethical Vegetarianism

Between the Species: A Journal of Ethics 19 (1):2-31 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article defends ethical vegetarianism, which, for present purposes, is stipulatively taken to be the view that it is morally wrong to eat animals when equally nutritious plant-based foods are available. Several examples are introduced to show that we all agree that animals deserve some direct moral consideration and to help identify and clarify several commonsense moral principles—principles we all accept. These principles are then used to argue that eating animals is morally wrong. Since you no doubt accept these principles, the argument demonstrates that consistency with your own beliefs and values commits you to the immorality of eating meat and requires you to alter your eating behavior accordingly. [Article available online at no cost at links listed above.]

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):39-48.
Killing for pleasure.Tzachi Zamir - 2004 - Between the Species 13 (4):4.
Is it wrong to eat animals?Loren Lomasky - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):177-200.
In Defense of Eating Meat.Timothy Hsiao - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):277-291.
Moral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis.David DeGrazia - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):143-165.
A Rawlsian Pro-Life Argument against Vegetarianism.John Zeis - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):63-71.
In Defense of Eating Vegan.Stijn Bruers - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (4):705-717.
A Catholic Case for Vegetarianism.Andrew Tardiff - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):210-222.
A Carnivorous Rejoinder to Bruers and Erdös.Timothy Hsiao - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6):1127-1138.
Five Arguments for Vegetarianism.William O. Stephens - 1994 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (4):25-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-21

Downloads
138 (#129,483)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mylan Engel Jr
Northern Illinois University

References found in this work

All Animals Are Equal.Peter Singer - 1989 - In Tom Regan & Peter Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Oxford University Press. pp. 215--226.
Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal cases.Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245.
The Animal Rights Debate.Carl Cohen & Tom Regan (eds.) - 2001 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Moral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis.David DeGrazia - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):143-165.
The Immorality of Eating Meat.Mylan Engel - 2000 - Chapter in The Moral Life:856-889.

View all 10 references / Add more references