Sin and Bioethics: Why a Liturgical Anthropology is Foundational

Christian Bioethics 11 (2):221-239 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The project of articulating a coherent, canonical, content-full, secular morality-cum-bioethics fails, because it does not acknowledge sin, which is to say, it does not acknowledge the centrality of holiness, which is essential to a non-distorted understanding of human existence and of morality. Secular morality cannot establish a particular moral content, the harmony of the good and the right, or the necessary precedence of morality over prudence, because such is possible only in terms of an ultimate point of reference: God. The necessity of a rightly ordered appreciation of God places centrally the focus on holiness and the avoidance of sin. Because the cardinal relationship of creatures to their Creator is worship, and because the cardinal corporate act of human worship is the Liturgy, morality in general and bioethics in particular can be understood in terms of the conditions necessary, so as worthily to enter into Eucharistic liturgical participation. Morality can be summed up in terms of the requirements of ritual purity. A liturgical anthropology is foundational to an account of the content-full morality and bioethics that should bind humans, since humans are first and foremost creatures obliged to join in rightly ordered worship of their Creator. When humans worship correctly, when they avoid sin and pursue holiness, they participate in restoring created reality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

O Corpo e sua relação com o Sagrado.Luiz Gustavo Santos Teixeira - 2016 - Revista de Teologia 10 (17):213-221.
Utilisation of liturgical space in Pentecostal Churches.Marius Nel - 2015 - HTS Theological Studies 71 (2):01-07.
An eastern orthodox approach to bioethics.Stanley S. Harakas - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (6):531-548.
Anthropology: a continental perspective.Christoph Wulf - 2013 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Telling a Liturgical Tale: Storytelling in Early Jewish Liturgical Poetry.Laura Lieber - 2014 - Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 66 (3-4):209-232.
Anthropology and bioethics.Da du Toit - 1993 - Ethics and Medicine: A Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics 10 (2):35-42.
Bioethics and Christian Anthropology.Germain Grisez - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (1):33-38.
Wide reflective equilibrium as a method of justification in bioethics.Peter Nichols - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (5):325-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
47 (#330,788)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

H. Engelhardt Jr.
Last affiliation: Rice University

References found in this work

Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):1 - 19.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1958 - In Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the Good Life. Oup Usa.
Modern Moral Philosophy.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1997 - In Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
The Foundations of Bioethics.H. T. Engelhardt - 1986 - Ethics 98 (2):402-405.

View all 10 references / Add more references