Inconsistency

Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):113-130 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relationship between inconsistency and Lehrerian coherence is scrutinized. Like most coherence theorists of epistemic justification, Lehrer contends that consistency is necessary for coherence. Despite this contention, minimally inconsistent belief-sets prove coherent and rationally acceptable on Lehrer's account of coherence. Lehrer is left with the following dilemma: If consistency is necessary for coherence, then (i) he must revise his account of coherence accordingly and, more importantly, (ii) such coherence is nof necessary for justification, since intuitively we are justified in accepting such minimally inconsistent belief-sets. If, on the other hand, minimally inconsistent acceptance systems can be coherent, then to prevent pairwise inconsistent statements form readily cohering with such systems, Lehrer must deny that rational acceptance is closed under deduction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inconsistency: The coherence theorist’s nemesis?Mylan Engel - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):113-130.
Cohering with.Erik J. Olsson - 1999 - Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):273 - 291.
Coherence and the Truth Connection.Keith Lehrer - 2005 - Erkenntnis 63 (3):413-423.
Plausibilistic coherence.John R. Welch - 2014 - Synthese 191 (10):2239-2253.
Coherentism.Peter Murphy - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
12 (#929,405)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mylan Engel Jr
Northern Illinois University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references