AbstractCapital as a Social Kind provides an introduction to social kinds in social theory. Thinking about kinds, the way we sort the things of the world into categories -- water, for example, is a natural kind – has made an important contribution to our understanding of science in the last half century, but these advances have been largely applicable to the natural, rather than the social sciences. Drawing on the rich examples offered by Marx’s analysis of capital and exploring a methodology that will be of interest to both Marxist and non-Marxist social theorists alike, Capital as a Social Kind extends this approach to the study of social life. The book argues that, provoked by his study of Aristotle, Marx’s attentions foreshadowed contemporary themes in the realist philosophy of science. Importantly, social kind analysis is relevant not only to understanding his critique of political economy but illuminates also a materialist study of law, justice, morality and the transition to socialism. Social kind analysis also opens a path for the development of today’s moral realism by suggesting the need for a systematic study of the causal structures of social life. In this respect the importance of normative themes in Marxism is defended against claims that the Marxist tradition lacks the resources to call capitalism unjust or to defend morality and human rights. The origin of capital, Marx suggests, can be found in the rupture of an original unity between the laborer and the means of labor, and the book explores the way a structure of separations best characterizes capital as a social kind. This uncovers a little developed emphasis in Marx’s work – his focus on the phenomena of separation that define our lives and also on forms of association required to transcend them. Given that capitalism has made the instruments of labor instruments of social labor, forms of association that would recover worker control over them must be democratic. The transition to socialism, the book concludes, just is winning the battle of democracy. This book will be of interest to students and researchers of economics, philosophy and indeed any social science subject.
Similar books and articles
Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium.Ben Fine - 2001 - Routledge.
Us Before Me: Ethics and Social Capital for Global Well-Being.Patricia Illingworth - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Realism about causality in social science. Sociology's causal confusion / Douglas porpora; the mother of all isms: Causal mechanisms in political science / Andrew bennett; Marxisn crisis theory and causality / Robert albritton; on the clear comprehension of political economy: Social kinds and the significance of Marx's capital.Howard Engelskirchen - 2007 - In Ruth Groff (ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism About Causality in Philosophy and Social Science. Routledge.
The Facets of Social Capital.Mikael Rostila - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (3):308-326.
On the clear comprehension of political economy : social kinds and the significance of Section 2 of Marx's capital.Howard Engelskirchen - 2008 - In Ruth Groff (ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism About Causality in Philosophy and Social Science. Routledge.
On Ben Fine's Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium.Paul Burkett - 2004 - Historical Materialism 12 (1):233-246.
Productivity, Valorization and Crisis: Socially Necessary Unproductive Labor in Contemporary Capitalism.Murray E. G. Smith - 1993 - Science and Society 57 (3):262 - 293.
Value, Capital and Nature: Some Ecological Implications of Marx's Critique of Political Economy.Paul Burkett - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (3):332 - 359.
The Political Economy of the Household: An Institutional Approach to the Limits of The Freedom of Labour Contract.Jordi Mundós - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:87-95.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.