Inner speech and the body error theory

Frontiers in Psychology 15:1360699 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inner speech is commonly understood as the conscious experience of a voice within the mind. One recurrent theme in the scientific literature is that the phenomenon involves a representation of overt speech, for example, a representation of phonetic properties that result from a copy of speech instructions that were ultimately suppressed. I propose a larger picture that involves some embodied objects and their misperception. I call it “the Body Error Theory,” or BET for short. BET is a form of illusionism, but the particular version I favor is a cross-modal illusion. Newly described here, my hypothesis is that the experience of inner speech arises from a mix of interoception and audition. Specifically, there is the detection of slight but well-confirmed activities in the speech musculature that occur during inner speech, which helps to transform representations of normal but quiet nonverbal sounds that inevitably occur during inner speech, from breathing to background noise, into a mistaken perception of inner speech. Simply put, activities in the speech musculature mix with sounds to create the appearance of speech sounds, which thus explains the “voice within the mind.” I also show how BET’s cross-modal system fits with standard information processing accounts for speech monitoring and how it accommodates the central insights of leading theories of inner speech. In addition, I show how BET is supported by data from experience-sampling surveys and how it can be empirically tested against its rivals.

Similar books and articles

My Body, My Speech.Jimmy Alfonso Licon - 2024 - Think 23 (66):43-46.
Law as Counterspeech.Anjalee de Silva & Robert Mark Simpson - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4):493-510.
On Believing the Error Theory.Alexander Hyun & Eric Sampson - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (11):631-640.
On Having the Floor: Power, Etiquette, and Grammar.John David Grayson - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
How not to decide whether inner speech is speech: Two common mistakes.Daniel Gregory - 2024 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 23 (2):231-252.
The Error In 'The Error In The Error Theory'.Richard Joyce - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):519-534.
The ethics of free speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2010 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge. pp. 769-780.
Can We Believe the Error Theory?Bart Streumer - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (4):194-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-01

Downloads
124 (#149,213)

6 months
124 (#34,002)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ronald Endicott
North Carolina State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychology as the behaviorist views it.John B. Watson - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (2):248-253.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):381-390.
Thought and Language.A. L. Wilkes, L. S. Vygotsky, E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (55):178.
The symbol grounding problem.Stevan Harnad - 1990 - Physica D 42:335-346.

View all 16 references / Add more references