- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Can you avoid both inconsistency and conceit?
Metaphilosophy 17 (4):259-265 (1986)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Why inconsistency is not hell : Making room for inconsistency in science.Otavio Bueno - 2006 - In Erik J. Olsson (ed.), Knowledge and Inquiry: Essays on the Pragmatism of Isaac Levi. Cambridge University Press. pp. 70.
The fatalistic conceit.David Miller - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (2):310-323.
The mandevillean conceit and the profit-motive.Tony Lynch & Adrian Walsh - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (1):43-63.
Linear Algebra Representation of Necker Cubes II: The Routley Functor and Necker Chains.Chris Mortensen - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:10-25.
Leibniz's Argument for Primitive Concepts.Dennis Plaisted - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):329-341.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-10
Downloads
10 (#1,135,558)
6 months
1 (#1,478,435)
2010-08-10
Downloads
10 (#1,135,558)
6 months
1 (#1,478,435)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo