The Significance Test Controversy [Book Review]

&
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):170-181 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/23.2.170

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The methodology of positive economics : Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy.Uskali Mäki (ed.) - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
The significance test controversy. [REVIEW]Ronald N. Giere - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):170-181.
Review: The Significance Test Controversy. [REVIEW]Ronald N. Giere - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):170 - 181.
Philosophical aspects of the group selection controversy.John Cassidy - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):575-594.
The Meaning of Theism.John G. Cottingham (ed.) - 2007 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Significance testing, p-values and the principle of total evidence.Bengt Autzen - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (2):281-295.
Significance test or effect size?Siu L. Chow - unknown
Medical ethics: principles, persons, and perspectives: from controversy to conversation.K. M. Boyd - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):481-486.
Reader and text in the horizon of understanding methodology: Gadamer and methodological hermeneutics. [REVIEW]Derong Pan - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):417-436.
Perspectives on ethics.C. Parker - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):21-23.
The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
New Methodological Perspectives on Observation and Experimentation in Science.Wenceslao J. González (ed.) - 2010 - Oleiros: Netbiblo.
The Potential Relevance of the Test of the News by Lippmann and Merz for Critical Discourse Analysis.Eulalia Smuga-Fries - 2013 - Dialogue and Universalism 23 (1):161-170.
If you've got an effect, test its significance; if you've got a weak effect, do a meta-analysis.John F. Kihlstrom - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):205-206.
Reader and Text in the Horizon of Understanding Methodology: Gadamer and Methodological Hermeneutics.Pan Derong & Zhang Lin - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):417 - 436.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
5 (#1,510,250)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Causal Learning with Occam’s Razor.Oliver Schulte - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (5):991-1023.
A note on publication and the value of significance tests.M. Bloxham - 1976 - Theory and Decision 7 (1-2):135-139.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references