Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):341-350 (2009)

The methodological debate between Frank Knight and Terence Hutchison is usually framed in terms of the philosophical debates between positivism and intuitionism, or between empirical knowledge and theoretical knowledge. Hutchison's argument was, after all, a defense of the need for empirically-based economic knowledge, using the justificatory framework provided by logical positivism, and Knight was widely known for his defense of the understanding of economic theory often associated with Lionel Robbins. But the dispute between Knight and Hutchison was much more than a battle over the epistemological status of economics' basic postulates. For Knight, Hutchison's positivism posed risks for the discussion at the heart of liberal democracy. Hutchison, also, aimed his methodological criticism of economic theory at a similar target: the economic objectives of all societies would be achieved sooner if planners were guided by an empirical economic science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13501780903129322
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Essays in Positive Economics.Milton Friedman - 1953 - University of Chicago Press.
Risk, Uncertainty and Profit.Frank Knight - 1921 - University of Chicago Press.
Bertrand Russell on Power.Frank H. Knight - 1938 - Ethics 49 (3):253-285.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction.D. Wade Hands - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):287-291.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Formative Decade: Methodological Controversy in the 1930s.T. W. Hutchison - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):297-314.
Machlup's Misrepresentation of Hutchison's Methodology.John Hart - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):325-340.
Terence Hutchison's 1938 Essay: Towards a Reappraisal.John Hart - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):353-373.
A Conversation with Terence Hutchison.John Hart - 2002 - Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (3):359-377.
An Unfinished Manuscript by Terence Hutchison.Roger E. Backhouse - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):293-296.
John A. Hutchison, 1912-2000.Julia K. Hutchison - 2000 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 74 (2):111 - 112.
Did Milton Friedman's Methodology License the Formalist Revolution?D. Wade Hands - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (4):507-520.
Berkeley's Querist and its Place in the Economic Thought of the Eighteenth Century.T. W. Hutchison - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (13):52-77.


Added to PP index

Total views
60 ( #188,020 of 2,498,172 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,172 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes