The Monist 104 (4):526-539 (2021)

Authors
Nadine Elzein
University of Warwick
Abstract
Measures aimed at general deterrence are often thought to be problematic on the basis that they violate the Kantian prohibition against sacrificing the interests of some as a means of securing a greater good. But even if this looks like a weak objection because deterrence can be justified as a form of societal self-defence, such measures may be regarded as problematic for another reason: Harming in self-defence is only justified when it’s necessary, i.e., when there are no relatively harmless alternatives. While there are few harmless ways to remove the threat posed by dangerous individuals, there are many relatively harmless methods for preventing crime. We can bracket off our preventative failings when we think of present threats, but we cannot do so when contemplating alternative preventative measures.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/monist/onab017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Self-Defense.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4):283-310.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Defence of Deterrence.Arthur Hockaday - 1982 - In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
The Limits of Deterrence Theory in Cyberspace.Mariarosaria Taddeo - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):339-355.
Deterrence in Cyberspace: A Silver Bullet or a Sacred Cow?Ewan Lawson - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):431-436.
Five Kinds of Cyber Deterrence.N. J. Ryan - forthcoming - Philosophy:331-338.
Who May Carry Out Protective Deterrence?By Michael Sprague - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):445–447.
Five Kinds of Cyber Deterrence.N. Ryan - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):331-338.
Who May Carry Out Protective Deterrence&Quest.Michael Sprague - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):445-447.
An Examination of a Moral Argument Against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-19

Total views
10 ( #899,562 of 2,506,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,711 of 2,506,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes