Is evolution fundamental when it comes to defining biological ontology? Yes

In Shamik Dasgupta, Brad Weslake & Ravit Dotan (eds.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue for the usefulness of the evolutionary kind of biological individual.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modeling Co‐evolution of Speech and Biology.Bart Boer - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (2):459-468.
Primitive Ontology in a Nutshell.Valia Allori - 2015 - International Journal of Quantum Foundations 1 (2):107-122.
Philosophy and Biomedical Information Systems.Barry Smith & Bert Klagges - 2008 - In Katherine Munn & Barry Smith (eds.), Applied Ontology: An Introduction. Ontos. pp. 17-30.
Piaget's Conception of Evolution.John Gerard Messerly - 1992 - Dissertation, Saint Louis University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-13

Downloads
298 (#65,257)

6 months
61 (#69,986)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ellen Clarke
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

Biological Individuals.Robert A. Wilson & Matthew J. Barker - 2024 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kinds of Biological Individuals: Sortals, Projectibility, and Selection.DiFrisco James - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (3):845-875.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references