Back to the future: A methodology for comparing old A-level and new AS standards

Educational Studies 28 (2):163-180 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Curriculum 2000 has meant significant change for the post-16 sector. New qualifications have been introduced (e.g. the new Advanced Subsidiary examination) and the number of students involved in education and training post-16 has increased. In this scenario how can the standards of new qualifications, particularly the new Advanced Subsidiary examinations, be compared with those of previous qualifications? One method is to use the prior achievement of candidates (i.e. GCSE results) as a basis for comparison of their results on subsequent qualifications (i.e. A levels and AS). This method of comparability and its limitations will be explored using examples with actual data

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Double Marking Revisited.Val Brooks - 2004 - British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (1):29 - 46.
The comparability of scientific theories.Carl R. Kordig - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):467-485.
Could auditing standards be based on society's values?Omar Abdullah Zaid - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1185-1200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
9 (#1,219,856)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dearing and beyond: 14-19 Qualifications, Frameworks and Systems.Ann Hodgson & Ken Spours - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (1):96-97.

Add more references