An algebraic difference between isols and cosimple isols

Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (3):557-561 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a fairly simple algebraic property that distinguishes isols from cosimple isols

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2272743

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hyper-Torre isols.Erik Ellentuck - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (1):1-5.
A Δ02 theory of regressive isols.Erik Ellentuck - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (3):459 - 468.
Torre models in the isols.Joseph Barback - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):140-150.
A coding theorem for isols.Erik Ellentuck - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):378-382.
Incompatible extensions of combinatorial functions.Erik Ellentuck - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):752-755.
On hyper-Torre isols.Rod Downey - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (4):1160-1166.
Large families of incomparable a-isols.William S. Heck - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (2):250-252.
A note on regressive isols.Joseph Barback - 1966 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7 (2):203-205.
Isols and the pigeonhole principle.J. C. E. Dekker & E. Ellentuck - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):833-846.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#749,846)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis.Kenneth Kunen - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4):591-592.
Degrees of isolic theories.Erik Ellentuck - 1973 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 14 (3):331-340.

Add more references