Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (4):711-725 (2020)

Authors
E. Sonny Elizondo
University of California at Santa Barbara
Abstract
According to many of its advocates, one of the main attractions of Kantian moral philosophy is its metaethical innocence. The most interesting argument for such innocence appeals to Kantians' rationalism. Roughly, if moral action is simply rational action, then we do not need to appeal to anything beyond rationality to certify moral judgment. I assess this argument by reflecting on (dis)analogies between moral and logical forms of rationalism. I conclude that the Kantian claim to metaethical innocence is overstated. Kantians cannot avoid substantial metaethical commitments. Or if they can, it is not their rationalism that explains why this is so.
Keywords Kant  Morality  Metaethics  Cognitivism  Rationalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2020
DOI 10.1111/papq.12326
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How a Kantian Can Accept Evolutionary Metaethics.Frederick Rauscher - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):303-326.
Rationalism in Ethics.Noell Birondo - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley. pp. 4329-4338.
Against Moral Intellectualism.Zed Adams - 2014 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (1):37-56.
Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism.Matthew Bedke - 2017 - In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 292-307.
Schopenhauer and Non-Cognitivist Moral Realism.Colin Marshall - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2):293-316.
An Empirical Argument Against Moral Non-Cognitivism.Thomas Pölzler & Jen Wright - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Kant’s Two Internalist Claims.Paula Satne - 2013 - In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 597-608.
Cognitivism About Moral Judgement.Alison Hills - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 10.
Aesthetic Judgements and Motivation.Alfred Archer - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (6):1-22.
Reid on Moral Sentimentalism.Camil Golub - 2019 - Res Philosophica 96 (4):431-444.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-03

Total views
99 ( #118,171 of 2,506,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #24,197 of 2,506,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes