Is the brain analog or digital?

Cognitive Science Quarterly 1 (2):147-170 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It will always remain a remarkable phenomenon in the history of philosophy, that there was a time, when even mathematicians, who at the same time were philosophers, began to doubt, not of the accuracy of their geometrical propositions so far as they concerned space, but of their objective validity and the applicability of this concept itself, and of all its corollaries, to nature. They showed much concern whether a line in nature might not consist of physical points, and consequently that true space in the object might consist of simple [discrete] parts, while the space which the geometer has in his mind [being continuous] cannot be such

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
309 (#63,020)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chris Eliasmith
University of Waterloo

Citations of this work

The Tractable Cognition Thesis.Iris Van Rooij - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (6):939-984.
Analog and digital, continuous and discrete.Corey J. Maley - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (1):117-131.
How we ought to describe computation in the brain.Chris Eliasmith - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):313-320.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references