A Brief History of the Changing Occupations and Demographics of Coleopterists from the 18th Through the 20th Century

Journal of the History of Biology 47 (2):1-30 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Systematic entomology flourished as a branch of Natural History from the 1750s to the end of the nineteenth century. During this interval, the “era of Heroic Entomology,” the majority of workers in the field were dedicated amateurs. This article traces the demographic and occupational shifts in entomology through this 150-year interval and into the early twentieth century. The survey is based on entomologists who studied beetles (Coleoptera), and who named sufficient numbers of species to have their own names abbreviated by subsequent taxonomists. In the eighteenth century, 27 entomologists achieved this level of prominence, of whom 37% were academics, 19% were doctors, 11% had private incomes, 19% were clergymen, and 8% were government officials. Many of those with private incomes were members of the European aristocracy, and all but one were European men. The nineteenth century list included 192 entomologists, of whom 17% were academics, 16% were museum curators, 2% were school teachers, 15% were doctors, 6% were military men, 7% were merchants, 2% were government entomologists, 6% had private incomes, 5% were clergymen, 5% were government officials, and 4% were lawyers. The demographics of entomology shifted dramatically in the nineteenth century. Whereas many of the noteworthy entomologists of the eighteenth century were German, Swedish, or French, in the nineteenth century, many more European countries are represented, and almost one-fifth of the noteworthy entomologists were from the United States. The nineteenth century list, like the eighteenth century list, contains no women. By the twentieth century, 63% of 178 noteworthy systematic entomologists were paid professionals, teaching entomology courses in universities, or studying insect taxonomy in museums and government-sponsored laboratories. Only one person on the twentieth century list had a private income, but women (ten individuals) were included on the list for the first time

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Raphael Meldola and the Nineteenth-Century Neo-Darwinians.Anthony S. Travis - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):143 - 172.
Nineteenth century studies.Basil Willey - 1949 - New York,: Columbia University Press.
Nineteenth century studies: Coleridge to Matthew Arnold.Basil Willey - 1955 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The history of philosophy.Emile Bréhier - 1963 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
The Rise of Danish Agrarian Liberalism.Jeppe Nevers - 2013 - Contributions to the History of Concepts 8 (2):96-105.
[The concept of an organizational plan: some aspects of its history].H. LeGuyader - 1999 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 53 (3-4):339-379.
Latin American Philosophy.Alexander V. Stehn - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
31 (#503,056)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Foreword.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Volume 113, Number 5/6 - 2016 - the Journal of Philosophy.
Corresponding interests: artisans and gentlemen in nineteenth-century natural history.Anne Secord - 1994 - British Journal for the History of Science 27 (4):383-408.
Six Legs Better: A Cultural History of Myrmecology.Charlotte Sleigh - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (4):770-772.

Add more references