Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):759-766 (2015)

Authors
Samuel Elgin
University of California, San Diego
Abstract
Consequentialists maintain that an act is morally right just in case it produces the best consequences of any available alternative. Because agents are ignorant about some of their acts’ consequences, they cannot be certain about which alternative is best. Kagan contends that it is reasonable to assume that unforeseen good and bad consequences roughly balance out and can be largely disregarded. A statistical argument demonstrates that Kagan’s assumption is almost always false. An act’s foreseeable consequences are an extremely poor indicator of the goodness of its overall consequences. Acting based on foreseeable consequences is barely more reliably good than acting completely at random
Keywords Consequentialism  Epistemic objection  Statistics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-015-9602-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Consequentialism and Cluelessness.James Lenman - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (4):342-370.
Normative Ethics.Shelly Kagan - 1998 - Routledge.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Chance and the Dissipation of Our Acts’ Effects.Derek Shiller - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (2):334-348.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Clues for Consequentialists.Joanna M. Burch-Brown - 2014 - Utilitas 26 (1):105-119.
Consequentialism and Side Constraints.Daniel Nolan - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (1):5-22.
Can Act-Utilitarianism Be Put Into Practice?R. G. Frey - 1977 - Journal of Value Inquiry 11 (1):49-58.
One False Virtue of Rule Consequentialism, and One New Vice.Tim Mulgan - 1996 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):362-373.
Consequentialism and Permissibility.Brian Mcelwee - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (2):171-183.
Epistemic Instrumentalism and the Too Few Reasons Objection.Charles Côté-Bouchard - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3):337-355.
Epistemic Consequentialism.Jeffrey Dunn - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Consequentialist Options.Jussi Suikkanen - 2014 - Utilitas 26 (3):276-302.
The Price of Insisting That Quantum Mechanics is Complete.P. D. Magnus - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):257-267.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-05-07

Total views
32 ( #345,944 of 2,462,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,313 of 2,462,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes