The existence entailments of definite descriptions

Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (1):1-10 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contrary to a claim made by Kaplan (Mind 114:933–1003, 2005) and Neale (Mind 114:809–871, 2005), the readings available to sentences containing definite descriptions embedded under propositional attitude verbs and conditionals do pose a significant problem for the Russellian theory of definite descriptions. The Fregean theory of descriptions, on the other hand, deals easily with the relevant data

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,462

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-17

Downloads
210 (#110,023)

6 months
7 (#541,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Elbourne
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Demonstratives as individual concepts.Paul Elbourne - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):409-466.
Wondering about the future.Stephan Torre - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2449-2473.
Descriptions, truth value intuitions, and questions.Anders J. Schoubye - 2009 - Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (6):583-617.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
On referring.Peter F. Strawson - 1950 - Mind 59 (235):320-344.
Descriptions.Stephen Neale - 1990 - MIT Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references