Body and Society 24 (4):58-86 (2018)
AbstractOver the last few decades feminists, science and technology studies scholars and others have grappled with how to take materiality into account in understanding social practices, subjectivity and events. One key area for these debates has been drug use and addiction. At the same time, neuroscientific accounts of drug use and addiction have also arisen. This development has attracted criticism as simplistically reinstating material determinism. In this article we draw on 80 interviews with health professionals directly involved in drug-related public policy and service provision in three countries to identify the main ways the neuroscience of addiction is understood. We analyse these understandings using contemporary posthumanist theory to develop new options for conceptualizing matter in public responses to addiction. We close by calling for a new approach to addiction and the brain based on a process model of materiality and public debate.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.Bruno Latour - 2004 - Critical Inquiry 30 (2):225-248.
Posthumanist Performativity : Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.Karen Barad - 2006 - In Deborah Orr (ed.), Belief, Bodies, and Being: Feminist Reflections on Embodiment. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human.Samantha Frost - 2016 - Duke University Press.
Citations of this work
Mapping the Drugged Body: Telling Different Kinds of Drug-Using Stories.Fay Dennis - 2020 - Body and Society 26 (3):61-93.
Similar books and articles
What Do We Mean When We Call Someone a Drug Addict?Janet Jones - 2020 - Health Care Analysis 28 (4):391-403.
Neurobiologic Advances From the Brain Disease Model of Addiction.Nora D. Volkow, George F. Koob & A. Thomas McClellan - 2016 - New England Journal of Medicine 374:363-371.
Towards a ‘Sociorelational’ Approach to Conceptualizing and Managing Addiction.Yvette van der Eijk & Susanne Uusitalo - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (2):198-207.
Birth of a Brain Disease: Science, the State and Addiction Neuropolitics.Scott Vrecko - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (4):52-67.
Impulsivity, Dual Diagnosis, and the Structure of Motivated Behavior in Addiction.R. Andrew Chambers - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):443-444.
Bridging the Gap Between Science and Drug Policy: From “What” and “How” to “Whom” and “When”.Robert J. MacCoun - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):454-455.
Q: Is Addiction a Brain Disease or a Moral Failing? A: Neither.Nick Heather - 2017 - Neuroethics 10 (1):115-124.
Public Understandings of Addiction: Where Do Neurobiological Explanations Fit?Carla Meurk, Adrian Carter, Wayne Hall & Jayne Lucke - 2014 - Neuroethics 7 (1):51-62.
Brains Are Important Too: Reply to Hall, Carter, and Barnett.Marc Lewis - 2017 - Neuroethics 10 (1):111-114.