Karl Popper, 1902–1994: Radical fallibilism, political theory, and democracy

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):135-153 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Abstract Popper's philosophy of science represents a radical departure from almost all other views about knowledge. This helps account for serious misunderstandings of it among admirers no less than among adversaries. The view that knowledge has and needs no foundations is counterintuitive and apparently relativistic. But Popper's fallibilism is in fact a far cry from anti?realism. Similarly, Popper's social and political philosophy, although seemingly conservative in practice, can be quite radical in theory. And while Popper was an ardent democrat, his reasons for supporting democracy were so unusual that they may escape the problem posed for democratic theory by the political ignorance of the demos.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,702

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Popper and Reliabilism.Peter Lipton - 1995 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39:31-43.
Recovering popper: For the left?Bruce Caldwell - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):49-68.
The use and abuse of sir Karl Popper.David L. Hull - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
Popper's Communitarianism.Jeff Kochan - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272). Springer. pp. 287--303.
Rationalism and tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott conversation.Struan Jacobs & Ian Tregenza - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1):3-24.
Karl Popper.Philip Parvin - 2010 - New York: Continuum.


Added to PP

34 (#357,501)

6 months
1 (#479,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Public ignorance and democratic theory.Jeffrey Friedman - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (4):397-411.

Add more citations