E-Capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox

Theory and Decision 46 (2):107-138 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ellsberg's (1961) famous paradox shows that decision-makers give events with ‘known’ probabilities a higher weight in their outcome evaluation. In the same article, Ellsberg suggests a preference representation which has intuitive appeal but lacks an axiomatic foundation. Schmeidler (1989) and Gilboa (1987) provide an axiomatisation for expected utility with non-additive probabilities. This paper introduces E-capacities as a representation of beliefs which incorporates objective information about the probability of events. It can be shown that the Choquet integral of an E-capacity is the Ellsberg representation. The paper further explores properties of this representation of beliefs and provides an axiomatisation for them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preference reversal in Ellsberg problems.Patrick Maher & Yoshihisa Kashima - 1997 - Philosophical Studies 88 (2):187-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
45 (#335,929)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.Glenn Shafer - 1976 - Princeton University Press.
Non-Additive Beliefs in Solvable Games.Hans Haller - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (4):313-338.

Add more references